Dedicated to the memory of our friend and mentor, Paul R. Boden
"To God Be The Glory"



The American Prophet

Commentary by Rev. Michael Bresciani

Move Over D-Day, Flag Day and Father’s Day - Obama Gives June To LBGT

image
June 6 is D-Day, June 14 is Flag Day and this year we will celebrate Fathers Day on June 21. These observances have long been a deep and revered part of American culture. Lookout, here comes change.

June has traditionally been a month of honoring fathers, soldiers and patriots. Now, thanks to the social engineering of Barack Obama, we have a whole month to celebrate lesbians, bi-sexuals, gays and transgenders. In America, there will be about 290 million people who will likely not be rushing out to observe this month long celebration.

Barack Obama proclaimed June as LBGT month, saying he has partnered with the gay community to “advance a wide range if initiatives.” He plans to enhance hate crimes, repeal “don’t ask - don’t tell” in the military and advance the right for gays to adopt.

We can’t say we didn’t see it coming, but choosing the month of June is almost a slap in the face to millions of Americans who choose to remember the fathers’ warriors and patriots who have given so much to make the country what it is. Nothing could seem more like a futile attempt to mix oil and water. This is indeed social engineering, but it is not very sociable.

image
The proclamation comes in the same week Evan Thomas of Newsweek made the amazing observation about Barack Obama following his speech in Cairo. On Friday June 5, 2009 Thomas said on MSNBC: “I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above - above the world, he’s sort of God.”

It has become increasingly difficult for the mainstream media to deny their extreme bias for Barack Obama and almost all his policies but now they have capitulated to the place where they are bordering on his deification.

Although it doesn’t get as much coverage in the media, those who have studied eschatology - or the second coming of Christ - see him as just the opposite. Some are wondering if he is the dreaded antichrist or the false prophet spoken of in the book of Revelation. It may be far too soon to tell, but now one belief does not seem all that extravagant compared to the other.

Perception for some can be greater than reality. Every St. Patrick’s Day throughout the world the beloved song Danny Boy is requested in gatherings of those who celebrate the Irish. In fact, the song was written by Englishman, Fred E. Weatherly. Don’t try to tell that to the revelers on the day of ‘wearing the green.’ Just sing the song.

image
We dare not tell those who hung on the President’s speech in Cairo last week that America is not really one of the world’s great Muslim countries. Just sing the song!

Will someone eventually explain to the president that there are yet millions of Americans who think the gay lifestyle is a perfect perversion of both the laws of God and of nature? They don’t mind the freedom that gays have under the first and the fourteenth amendment to have their own lifestyle. Its America. But they are not even close to helping them celebrate it. Again, just sing the song.

The best minds even among the Dems and a few liberals have begun to see something about our President that could not be known until now. Entering the second hundred days into his administration, it is slowly becoming apparent that Barack Obama isn’t playing the liberal card or the conservative card. He also is not favoring democratic agenda or the views of the beleaguered GOP. It’s not for the Christians or for the Muslims Mr. Obama speaks and shapes his policies. It is for himself.

It is the obvious attempt to consolidate power to and for him alone that makes the statement about Obama being a god made by Newsweek’s Evan Thomas a verbal gushing and sycophantic excess. It would be more honest to say that Mr. Obama is more like a chameleon who changes color to fit the background he is in rather than a god.

Whatever works to consolidate and advance his own agenda, policies or views is the path he chooses. Can’t lose the contingent of gay votes even if it is only a minority, give them tacitly what they want but don’t tread on the huge contingent of voters who are both a majority and those who will not accept anything but marriage between one man and one woman. Reversing these positions would be a guarantee that he would be a one term president. That’s a song Mr. Obama does not want to sing.

It is hard to believe that a nation once firmly guided by laws, principles and morality is now going headlong at supersonic speed toward something known simply as ‘change.’ This song has seen many renditions in the past. It is a song sung by other nations and other systems of governance but it always failed and faded somewhere between the first stanza and the chorus. Let’s see.

Hitler called for change from a parliamentary form of government to a Reich with a quack leading the orchestra, this piece de-tuned after the world almost died listening to its dissonant strains.

In China, Mao thought to sing the song of change from every ancient institution of the noble Chinese and not until almost every semblance of that world was flattened was the music silenced.

The list of great calls for change that ended in disaster, destruction and disillusionment for nations small and great is too large to be addressed here.

It has been said that when religion and culture clash, that it is culture that always comes out on top. The same principle is at work when it comes to something as nebulous, perhaps even frivolous as change. Change will not win. Eventually America will long for the principles that not only guided her but produced a steadiness and a foundation that sustained the country’s uniqueness and provided an immovable base on which to grow.

image
Anyone with an ounce of common sense has always stood amazed at the twisted reasoning in the liberal agenda. How liberals come to the conclusions they do is hard enough to understand but even more puzzling is the fact that they can’t seem to see the consequences of their views if carried out. They don’t see or just don’t accept that premise A, will always lead to result B, in time. They seem to lack the ability to project the results of their views into the future. It is that inability that adds definition to the term "common sense". Change can be a part of common sense but it can never be a substitute for it in total.

The business of overlaying an entire month of honor for gays and lesbians on June’s three revered special days honoring warriors, patriots and fathers is a perfect picture of change for change’s sake. It reeks of callousness for American institutions and American culture and history. But maybe Mr. Obama really believes this is a Muslim or a gay leaning nation! Isn’t there someone in his cabinet or his family circle that could tell him the facts? Has change now become the substitute for truth?

Since gays are not allowed any place in real Muslim countries, and here in Obama’s ‘Biggest Muslim country’ they are favored and coddled, hasn’t anyone the nerve to tell him that this really makes us the biggest ‘fake’ Muslim country in the world?

Having mentioned only a few attempts in our world to put change ahead of foundation that miserably failed in the past, lets look to one interesting change that will fail in the future. When the Bible speaks of the coming world leader known as the antichrist it describes a few of his personal attributes and character traits in detail. Alas, should we guess what one of them might be, you guessed it…change!

In a discourse about the world’s last leader, not only is the length of time he will rule given but it is said that he will overtake the Christian believers and enforce a change of many laws, seasons and cultural observations. Some eschatologists think he may even try to change how we mark or delineate time from BC and AD to something that marks the time of his entrance into power. The bottom line is change. He will call for change and he will get it, but only for a short time. Following antichrist’s changes will be the final change from the rule of men to a blessed theocratic rule with Christ on the earth, in Jerusalem and ruling with a rod of iron.

The Prophet Daniel says, “And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.” (Daniel 7:25)

He is given three and a half years to work his change. But after that, the shape of the earth will change forever. Then we will all sing a new song entitled Glory To God In The Highest.

Posted on 06/10/09 at 05:51 PM

Comments

June has always been the “traditional month” for weddings… As between one male and one female… So in someways—-this is a slap on that also…

Posted by (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  06/17  at  09:14 PM

Charlotte, Very astute observation, I hadn’t thought thought of that.

Many things are changing here in America, it is a shaking but we of the faith cannot be shaken.

Bless God,

Rev MB

Posted by Rev Michael Bresciani  on  06/18  at  05:48 AM

Something else you apparently didn’t think of:  June is the anniversary of the Stonewall riots.  Given your complete omission of this fact, it seems that you might actually learn something from a LBGT month.  If you’d like to know what happened in June, 1969, read this: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonewall_riots

Cliff’s notes:  Police, along side something called the (i kid you not) “Public Morals Squad” went around arresting gay people for being “too gay.”  One night in late June 1969, these innocent people decided that they’d had enough and rebelled.  Here you had essentially patriots, standing up for their constitutional rights and fighting back against an American Gestapo.  But, no, that’s not really worth remembering, is it?  Jeez, the nerve of these gays, to fight oppression so close to Father’s Day!

Posted by (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  06/24  at  07:51 AM

XI,
The abuse and/or mistreatment to anyone is wrong. Homesexuality, according to scripture, is also wrong. Two wrongs don’t make a right, no matter how you slice it.

Noone has the right to abuse or mistreat a homosexual. And homosexuals should be afforded the same human rights as anyone else. But homosexuals do not have the right to redefine marriage nor try to force the homosexual lifestyle as normal or acceptable to society in general.

Two wrongs simply do not make a right.

Posted by (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  06/24  at  08:44 AM

Mac,
You know what else is wrong?  Pretending that a monumental injustice never happened.  By failing to even mention Stonewall, this article is one big lie-by-omission. 

Here’s an instructive exercise:  Go back to your last post and replace the word “Homosexual” with “Black” or “Jew” or “Female” or “Christian”. 

BTW, I realize this is fairly pointless to argue here.  After all, the article goes so far as to claim Obama is the friggin’ anti-christ.  Stay classy people!

Posted by (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  06/24  at  09:13 AM

I was always aware of Stonewall but I hardly think the injustice seen there is a mandate to justfy the heavy handed gay agenda we are enduring today.

As someone has already said two wrongs don’t make a right.

Perhaps I should mention New Orleans Southern Decadence celebrations or the San Diego gay parade in which children were exposed to fawning, sexually deviate materials and paraphenalia and a general side show debauch.

If I recounted every instance where gays were assaulted or insulted in the last decade it would still change nothing of what I wrote.

We are a nation prone to making excuses which we carry with us almost as warrants to hurt, maime and destroy because we have been hurt.

Heres an idea…grow up!

Posted by Rev Michael Bresciani  on  06/24  at  09:24 AM

Let me also add that if I lied by omission I would have to replace every article with a full book legnth manuscript lest I offend by leaving out one point.

No I never said Obama was the antchrist, perhaps the false prophet but would you know the difference?

Stay classy?? What is classy about perversion, abortion and promoting a lifestyle that will assuredly bring about the demise and eventual judgment of our nation?

I hear anger but I see no reason or civility in your remarks but as always as it pertains to statements made by gays I must consider the source.

In my thinking anyone who has chosen to follow the gay lifestyle already has impaired judgment and I don’t expect too much level thought after that.

Posted by Rev Michael Bresciani  on  06/24  at  09:32 AM

You know, its funny, in my thinking, anyone who has chosen to follow scripture already has impaired judgment.  Agree to disagree?

It doesn’t take a manuscript to note the real reason that June is the logical choice.  It takes one sentence.

The thing is, you don’t really find anything particularly sacred about June.  It didn’t matter what month was chosen, you would have manufactured whatever outrage you could think of. 

What do you really care about it anyway?  Since Obama is the anti-christ / false prophet / boogeyman, aren’t you all going to be magically teleported to heaven in a few years?  oh right… for the children… i almost forgot.

Posted by (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  06/24  at  10:10 AM

Reverend Bresciani, the very first paragraph of Obama’s proclamation reads:

“Forty years ago, patrons and supporters of the Stonewall Inn in New York City resisted police harassment that had become all too common for members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community. Out of this resistance, the LGBT rights movement in America was born. During LGBT Pride Month, we commemorate the events of June 1969 and commit to achieving equal justice under law for LGBT Americans.”

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Presidential-Proclamation-LGBT-Pride-Month/

I’d also like to note that celebrating Pride Month is not a “slap in the face” to fathers, WWII veterans, and our flag—after all, we manage to celebrate Black History Month and Presidents Day, don’t we?

Posted by cognitive dissident  on  06/24  at  11:05 AM

I can see my words are wasted on you. We who believe in both the Bible and our constitution have to tread a fine line.

First we can never accept being gay as anything but sin and something for which a person will lose their salvation. This is sad to us and we preach against homosexuality not just to be against it but for the sake of the souls we believe our Bible’s tell us will be lost because of it.

Secondly we believe our constitution allows equal protection under the first and the fourteenth amenment for homosexuals.

What we don’t believe is that it is something that either the gays or we should be ‘proud’ of.

Gay pride, maybe for you but for the rest of us it is a sad testimony of how far we have sunk as a nation and how close we are to the judgments of God.

I will let the scriptures we trust speak for themselves from the first cahpter of Romans,

“Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet.

And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient”

To become ‘reprobate’ simply means that a persons ability to recognize the thruth or any cousel as having come from a Holy God is gone. This is one of the worst states for a human being to be in.

Posted by Rev Michael Bresciani  on  06/24  at  11:34 AM

See? was that so hard?  Next time you get all frothy about someone else not living up to *your* faith, rather than making up a bunch of non-sense about D-Day or Father’s Day or the sanctity of marriage, just copy and paste what you just wrote:  that there can be no “Gay Pride” because *you* are not proud of them.

Posted by (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  06/24  at  12:21 PM

XI, I’m with the Rev., grow up, man. You come across like a typical arrogant little queen.

There is NO nonsense in what the Rev stated in the article. He stated plain, simple, historical fact concerning the American observances of those holidays or traditions. Read it again.

He also NEVER said there was NO gay pride, neither in the article or his comments above. Read ‘em.

So, the next time YOU get frothy over someone not agreeing with or accepting the gay lifestyle, at least stick with the facts and your own opinion, not made up *nonsense*.

Posted by passnthru  on  06/24  at  12:47 PM

“choosing the month of June is almost a slap in the face to millions of Americans who choose to remember the fathers’ warriors and patriots who have given so much to make the country what it is.” 

Passnthru,
That right there is non-sense. 

A typical arrogant little queen, eh? thats rich.  I guess if I was gay, then that would be some sort of insult?  What are you gonna do about it?  Are you fixin’ to go git yer pickup truck and have a queer drag?  or do you just sound like a typical in-bred little bible-thumper.

It’s also rather hilarious to be told to “grow up” by bigots who believe in fairy tales.

Posted by (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  06/24  at  01:12 PM

Right, no pride whatsoever.

I thought I was was clear on that already.

I do have other things to do so I will let you slip and slide aroud this subject all by yourself.

Good Day Rev. MB

Posted by Rev Michael Bresciani  on  06/24  at  01:33 PM

Regardless of what month the president chose for this LBGT observance, it is still offensive to at least some, if not many Americans - Christian or not.

Typical in-bred little bible-thumper? I guess that is supposed to be some sort of fire back insult? For the record, I happen to be a well-educated business professional in a large, northern Illinois city. But that is irrelevant.

Bigot? I find that a bit ironic and humorous coming from the likes of you. The ones who scream “tolerance” and “acceptance” the loudest are the ones who are the most intolerant, trying to force their own agenda upon others, with bitterness, hatred and vengeance. Man, just look at the tone of your own comments here.

Fairy tales? If you’re right, then you really have nothing to lose.

But IF you’re wrong…you really willing to take that chance?

Posted by passnthru  on  06/24  at  01:56 PM

The Constitution clearly permits many things (freedom of speech and religion, equal protection under the law, etc.) that are prohibited by your religious beliefs. Recognizing the freedom of others to make non-fundamentalist choices may seem like “treading a fine line” to you, but we are not obligated to believe in your deities, participate in your rituals, or observe your taboos.

The “slap in the face” line only makes sense if LGBT people are not also fathers, patriots, and warriors—which is not the case. According to Barna, 70% are Christians, too!

Posted by cognitive dissident  on  06/24  at  02:32 PM

Passnthru,
Hey man, just responding in kind.  My initial comment was simply to point out the real reason June was chosen.  The OP has now confirmed his true belief, and it has nothing to do with Father’s Day.  So good.

Yes, that was “some sort of fire back insult”.  You really are well-educated.  This much is obvious after hearing your “What if you’re wrong?” theory of divinity.  Are there any other heart-felt beliefs I should decide to adopt, you know, just in case?

Posted by (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  06/24  at  02:56 PM

Cognitive,
Mainstream fundamentalists seem to have given up trying to deny others the freedom to make their own choices.  The new trend is to say “keep it out of my face”, or “I don’t want to hear about it.”  As if to say: Damn we already told you! we are sorry about all that mistreatment and abuse over the last few decades.  Why can’t you just keep your head down, your mouth shut and pretend it never happened, so that we don’t have to acknowledge you faggots exist? 

Basically, we don’t have to observe their taboo’s.  We just have to pretend that we do…. for the children.

Posted by (JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  06/24  at  03:11 PM

XI said:
“Are there any other heart-felt beliefs I should decide to adopt, you know, just in case?”

No, you’re obviously too smart to believe in God- or in anything bigger than yourself, for that matter. Silly me, how dare I even suggest that one of us COULD be wrong.

And the world is still flat.

Posted by passnthru  on  06/24  at  04:15 PM

It’s ironic to see a theist bringing up the flat-earth theory, considering that both it and heliocentrism were supported by Bible-bangers long after the scientific evidence was in.

Science is a self-correcting endeavor, whereas revealed religion…not so much.

Posted by cognitive dissident  on  06/24  at  04:27 PM

It isn’t Barna who determines who is a christian he simply polls them. Christ said a person must be born again and then follow him in obedience. Homosexuality is clearly disobedience from new to old testament. Professing to be a Christian is not enough. Church membership won’t do it only what has already been stated.

As a footnote. Yes, I do see it as a slap in the face to all those (About 290 million Americans who still cringe at the perversion known as homosexuality.

Our new socialist President has given us all a few slaps in the face and thats now part of the record.

He has slapped th faces of about two million people who are still waiting for his long form birth certificate and by so doing he is telling them they have no right constitutionally or otherwise even to ask the question. He has given them a slap on the other cheek by engaging law firms to the tune of an estimated $1,000,000 to supress the uncovering of his own birth certificate and other personal documents.

He has slapped private enterprise, CEOs and the market in the face by taking over their right to make their own determinations.

He has slapped the next generation in the face with a 9 trillion dollar debt long before they can learn to count to ten.

He has slapped honesty in the face with relationships to racist preachers, unrepentant bombers and organizations that are under investigation. This is particularly insulting because one of his promises to America is a new honesty and transparency.

He has slapped his independant inspector in the face for doing his job and uncovering the mis-use of government funds. You know the one he fired without warning for blowing the whistle.

I am getting bored writing this list because it is far from over.

Little wonder that he would offend and disregard the traditions, the sensibilities and in the case of millions the time honored practice of honoring fathers, patriots and veterans throughout the month of June. They get a day each. What presumption that gays get an entire month under the auspices of the proclaimation. Yes, that is a slap in the face.

He has slapped 4,000 children a day in the face by allowing, no, by promoting the scourge, the domestic genocide of this nation’s unborn.

Do you think I should retract, recant or deny what I have said. Don’t hold your breath.

Do you think you can pop into a blog breathe a little fire on everyone and make headlines,  opinion changes, or even salient points.

It seems something in your thinking long ago caught fire and is now missing. I think the term is ‘burned out.’ Are you looking for it, complaining or blaming us because it is gone?

Those who stand on God’s word aren’t moved because of a little firebreathing, socialistic rhetoric or simple nastiness.

His word would not be the immovable rock Christ said it was if it were that flimsy and shifting.

I have had a long day but I thought I should at least clarify a few points.

Goodnight,

Rev MB

Posted by Rev Michael Bresciani  on  06/24  at  09:12 PM

This outrageous article exposes the Rev Michael Bresciani as both an imbecile AND a fascist. When I posted extracts on my Freethinker website (http://freethinker.co.uk/2009/06/24/june-is-bustin’-out-all-over-–-with-fundie-fury/), it attracted a number of very pertinent comments. Here are just some:

• So gay people can`t be “fathers, soldiers and patriots” then? The implications of this bigot`s statements are obvious!

• Wonderful that this guy mentions D-Day first, without any apparent awareness that the Nazis rounded up and murdered homosexuals, and that (by any reasonable assessment) thousands of Allied troops who hit the beach at Normandy must have been gay. Jaw-dropping imbecility.

• The man does indeed espouse fascist views. If homosexuals are not “warriors and patriots”, then they must, by implication, be cowards and traitors!

• He also forgets that plenty of gay people want to be “warriors and patriots” but our military bans them from doing so (though many still serve anyway).

• Nevermind that June is the anniversary of Stonewall, a glaring omission from that ridiculous rant.

• Occupations that are particularly attractive to gays, since they provide access to lots and lots of men without women, include the priesthood, the boy scouts, and the military. While the statistics do not apply to conscripts, volunteer armies tend to be overwhelmingly gay. If America purged its armed forces of all gays, there would not be enough fighting men left to defend against an invasion from Grand Fenwick.

• Where have these morons been? June has been Pride Month for decades. Obama has nothing to do with it and that “proclamation” was likely written by a jr. level staffer. Obama doesn’t give a toot about us and only throws a few crumbs our way whenever he feels he absolutely must to avoid all of the LGBT supporters deserting the Democratic party completely.

Posted by Barry Duke  on  06/25  at  03:41 AM

This is becoming droll.

You have your protections of the law and are now gaining more general acceptance across the board do you think now they should make laws that force us to like it.

Even in this America that is not going to happen.

I care little where you have posted your objections and as for name calling I believe you may be straining the protocol of this fine website to the limit.

I will not enter this debate with you any further suffice it to say that “I have written what I have written”

Rev MB

Posted by Rev Michael Bresciani  on  06/25  at  06:00 AM

Lest I forget, “thousands of those dropped on Normandy may have been gay”??

This little gay re-writing of history is more proof enough that you live in an alternate world of your own creation.

Addressing this nonsense would not be a good accounting of my time.

Rev MB

Posted by Rev Michael Bresciani  on  06/25  at  06:05 AM

Approximately 130-150,000 troops were landed at Normandy on D-Day, which puts the number of gays in the initial invasion force at between 1,300 (1% of 130K) and 7,500 (5% of 150K), to make a conservative estimate. That’s not a “gay re-writing of history,” that’s simple math. (This does not include any portion of the 850,000 or so that followed over the next few weeks.)

You seem to hate Obama quite passionately, but calling him a socialist (not by any stretch of the imagination), blaming him for the national debt (over $10 trillion before his inauguration), and buying into the “Birther” conspiracy (debunked long ago) and other rumors do little to enhance your credibility.

Your holy text—or your understanding of it—may be immovable, but morality will nonetheless continue to progress. You can allege “slaps in the face” as much as you wish, but most Americans have come to understand homosexuality in a far more accurate way than was possible thousands of years ago.

Posted by cognitive dissident  on  06/25  at  07:35 AM
Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >

Add your Comment

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

About The Author

Rev. Michael Bresciani
Rev. Michael Bresciani is a graduate of Delgado College and Union Seminary in New Orleans, Louisiana and has been the pastor of four non-denominational churches in various states. He hosted his own radio show for more than ten years and has written many articles over the past thirty years in such periodicals as Guideposts and Catholic Digest.

Rev. Bresciani is the author of two books: "Hook, Line and Sinker or What Has Your Church Been Teaching You?" and "An American Prophet and His Message... Questions and answers on The Second Coming of Christ".

'Hook Line and Sinker' is based on "Refutation Preaching", and calls the believer to re-examine many beliefs, notions, clichés, and practices of the church of today. Although controversial it is a fair and conservative call to help Christians deepen their connection to Christ.

'An American Prophet' is unusually formatted in three distinct parts. The first part is auto-biographical, the second is a message to America, and the last is a section of the most frequently asked questions about the second coming of Christ, with answers. He has helped hundreds of people better understand the doctrine of the second coming. Yet, the heart of his preaching and teaching is singularly to point the church back to it's "first love" in these last days.



Previous Posts

Archives